My experience with Lapalingo

**Glumbi** · 18.06.19, 15:54

Today I wanted to talk about my last experience with Lapalingo tell. The casino has a Malta license, so it can basically be classified as serious, only with the bonus conditions have many players stumbled. A friend asked me if I'm currently playing there, I said no, it's not a long time ago, he said there's just never a win.

That there can always be a win here and there and then not for a very long time is generally not unusual but I thought oh come on I received an email last Saturday that I can use a 100% bonus and I accepted it. Deposited only €30 and started with €60 very important to pay attention to the forbidden games and the maximum spin of €5 per spin with bonus.

I had to wager €900, which I managed to do, and in the end I had €300 in bonus money, which I now had to convert into real money, which I did. I thought now I'll see how the payout will progress, I've never had a payout there, although I had played there quite a while ago. I paid out €200 to Neteller just like I had deposited and I just gambled away the €100.

It took about 24 hours, then an email came that Neteller screenshots are needed, as well as an invoice with my address on it and a copy of my ID. I then saw that my old address was still there, so I announced the change in the live chat and uploaded all the documents. After almost half a day, another email came that the Neteller screenshots were invalid because the ID was not visible there, which was not the case. I paid special attention to it, but took new pictures and marked the lines in color.

But in the meantime I had gotten to the point where I thought, oh come on, I'll get the 200 back and when it's gone then gone, who knows whether it will be paid out, was slightly annoyed and a little unsure whether everything would work out. So said done, brought it back and continued playing... about 4 hours last night until night.. in the end I had 1700€ in my account. :-)

So I put these in the payout and then waited, this morning I saw that the Neteller documents were then valid and around noon the money on Neteller was over.

In the end everything went really well and I'm a bit relieved. I would even think that the next time without verification the whole thing will be even faster. If you pay attention to all bonus conditions, I also believe that you will not have any problems there. I would like to add that I have always been very careful not to violate any of the terms and conditions, I have never played more than €2 even with the converted real money, although €5 would have been safe to play Well, because I wasn't sure if playing over €5 before the final payout would violate the bonus terms and conditions, I wouldn't have risked it.

**affiliate team** · 19.06.19, 10:20

The following can be said about this: we want to Lapalingo not bad at all, but in this business, as an operator of websites and forums, you are logically dependent on entering into a partnership with certain companies. You build up a certain customer base and get paid for it. Otherwise one could not run websites or build forums, which require an enormous investment of time and work.

Also, one could not provide any help in many things, support players to solve problems etc. As a "so-called partner of companies" one should, however, take a close look with whom one enters into a partnership. That Lapalingo The fact that it has not been deliberately linked or recommended here to date is solely due to the fact that the customer base that has been newly accumulated up to that point will simply be deleted again after 1 year or will no longer be remunerated. At the latest after that it would be very difficult for help or problem solving.

These are criteria that are difficult to accept, even if the casino itself may be okay. As you can see, webmasters have different reasons for recommending a casino or not. The tough and tedious discussion was already complicated enough for us at the time, so we didn't pursue it any further. Therefore, we would like to leave it as it is for the time being, because it is not an acceptable partner program conditions for us. Also the casinoBonus terms themselves are not acceptable and thus exists for Lapalingo basically no real recommendation.

**freakspin** · 19.06.19, 15:07

There are many new faces ahead and especially behind Lapalingothat at least communication has or will improve. I missed that with the 1 year. Definitely a regulation that is only advantageous for the casino. But maybe you can do something with new contacts...

**gamblejohn** · 20.06.19, 02:54

In the end everything went really well and I'm a bit relieved. I would even think that the next time without verification the whole thing will be even faster. If you pay attention to all bonus conditions, I also believe that you will not have any problems there. I would like to add that I have always been very careful not to violate any of the terms and conditions, I have never played more than €2 even with the converted real money, although €5 would have been safe to play Well, because I wasn't sure if playing over €5 before the final payout would violate the bonus terms and conditions, I wouldn't have risked it.

My experience with Lapalingo It's very similar, I got free money back then and I had already informed myself about the conditions beforehand. So it was clear to me that there was a maximum of €100 to be won if I managed to play through. However, nobody had ever told me that after the turnover and the transfer to the real money account, I would still be treated as a bonus player. Since I then used the real money to play other games with higher stakes, I was denied everything. The support then claims that you have to pay out your money first. Really bad ash the casino!

**Glumbi** · 20.06.19, 07:20

Yes, this point is really bad and that's really annoying. If you know the rule and stick to it, it seems to be going so far there, but clearly this procedure should be abolished.

**affiliate team** · 20.06.19, 11:20

Posted by freakspin

There are many new faces ahead and especially behind Lapalingothat at least communication has or will improve. I missed that with the 1 year. Definitely a regulation that is only advantageous for the casino. But maybe you can do something with new contacts...

These new faces or new responsible persons are not known to us and we can therefore not make any statement about a possible "improved" communication. We don't believe that this affiliate program condition (1 year) can be negotiated away so easily, because you can't really control it either. We've been registered for longer Lapalingo but this condition has so far prevented us from becoming active there at all. The fact is that this condition exists and we have not found this in any other company in all these years.

To be honest, we find the mere thought of imposing such conditions very alarming. With other companies there are other criteria or bad conditions that prevent you from entering into a partnership or even warn you against it afterwards. There will always be contenders who can fulfill certain conditions of the programs where others may have difficulty, for various reasons. What is bad for one is good for another.

**Glumbi** · 01.07.19, 15:26

I can't say anything about the background or the people behind it. For me only the experience as a player counted, in this case it was better than expected.

I think there are certainly better casinos to advertise or work with. The bonus conditions are not very fair, that's true, I would also advise everyone against playing there with a bonus, for me it was a kind of test to see how it behaves there with real money conversion, etc. that I did a good profit was just luck.