understanding question

[ewsg01]

Hallo,

Can someone explain to me how this paragraph can, should or must be interpreted?

"Using the double up feature to increase bet values."

thanks in advance.

[playtime chris]

Unfortunately, this passage is often wrongly translated from the original English conditions into bad German. I once inserted the same paragraph for you from one of our listed casinos. I hope it clarifies what is meant by that.

Some games also have a "gamble feature" where every win in the game is used towards a bigger win betting. "Gamble Features" may not be used, when playing with bonus money.

[ewsg01]

Thank you for the explanation.

That's silly to me, but if that's the case, then so be it.

[playtime chris]

Playing with a bonus used to be quite attractive and the conditions clear. Today, it's more like playing the lottery as these terms are often longer than the terms and conditions.

However, casinos have never liked playing on a simple chance, as doubling is similar to roulette. However, the meaning has not really been explained to me until today. 50/50 chances are not risk-free games, as is often described.

[ewsg01]

Doubling the risk here has nothing to do with doubling or multiplying your bet. The attraction here is to climb the ladder.
If I win an amount of 100 euros and I push it up, I'm lucky. If I crash the casino is lucky.
As a result, playing loses its appeal and I suspect that the conditions are becoming more and more complicated and misunderstood in order to be able to withhold a possible win. Just sitting in front of the tab or monitor and waiting for a win is too boring for me.
Rules could also be created that make winning impossible. But is that the point of every gambler?
Gambling is the attraction of gambling. That is absolutely incomprehensible to me and I will draw my own conclusions from it.

[playtime spielo]

A really interesting topic and it is actually in many casinos. Personally, I'm also a high roller who loves to double down. Not infrequently I've just raised it to a few thousand €, but that's also one of the reasons why I did No way redeem a bonus. Especially since that's not the only clause you have to pay attention to.

[ewsg01]

Bonus or not, without a gamble, playing loses its appeal. This is comparable to a crime novel without murder.
Isn't every gamer's goal to experience the thrill of pressing the button and then hoping it goes up a notch?
From a purely technical point of view, it would be possible to prevent such exceptions as well, so this violation of the rules would be counteracted.
This rule, which is not really meaningful, is only there to provoke violations and then say sorry you have broken our rules and therefore we cannot pay out. Here something like that is accepted with an unclear statement.

[playtime spielo]

Bonus or not, without a gamble, playing loses its appeal. This is comparable to a crime novel without murder.

I agree with you completely and playing would only be half as much fun for me. But I also think we are the minority there, many do not want to gamble by doubling and therefore do not have to observe such rules.

[playtime slotti]

One must not forget that casinos provide free bonuses. In return, they can also impose certain rules that may be more player-friendly in Casino A than perhaps in Casino B. This is determined individually by the company and is based on the experience of customer gaming behavior. And if the conditions in Casino A are more negative than in Casino B, then the conditions there have also been adjusted or tightened accordingly. Of course you can discuss how and why or fairness.